Published White Paper

IEEE White Paper

Interoperable Semantic Architectures for Traditional, Complementary, and Integrative Medicine In Electronic Health Record Systems

This white paper addresses the challenge of integrating traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM) into modern electronic health record (EHR) systems. While current EHRs support biomedical interoperability, they often lack structured, machine-interpretable mechanisms for capturing TCIM diagnostic frameworks, interventions, and therapies. Building on IEEE Industry Connections definitions of EMRs and EHRs, the paper highlights how TCIM data is frequently documented as unstructured or semantically reduced information, limiting interoperability, computability, and safety monitoring. In alignment with the WHO Global Traditional Medicine Strategy 2025–2034 and growing AI adoption in healthcare, the paper proposes a layered semantic interoperability architecture for FHIR-based EHR ecosystems. The approach enables structured coexistence of biomedical and TCIM ontologies through domain context metadata, intervention parameterization, practitioner profiling, and AI-assisted terminology harmonization. The objective is to improve multimodal care documentation, longitudinal data completeness, and interoperability while preserving ontological integrity and compatibility with established healthcare standards.

Status
Published White Paper
History
Published:
2026-08-07

Working Group Details

Other Activities From This Working Group

Current projects that have been authorized by the IEEE SA Standards Board to develop a standard.


No Active Projects

Standards approved by the IEEE SA Standards Board that are within the 10-year lifecycle.


No Active Standards

These standards have been replaced with a revised version of the standard, or by a compilation of the original active standard and all its existing amendments, corrigenda, and errata.


No Superseded Standards

These standards have been removed from active status through a ballot where the standard is made inactive as a consensus decision of a balloting group.


No Inactive-Withdrawn Standards

These standards are removed from active status through an administrative process for standards that have not undergone a revision process within 10 years.


No Inactive-Reserved Standards
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Sign up for our monthly newsletter to learn about new developments, including resources, insights and more.