This white paper reports insights derived from two workshops held in Tokyo in June 2024, conducted to explore Japanese and regional insights on ethical questions regarding the use of technology to emulate empathy, general-purpose artificial intelligence (GPAI), and human-AI partnering. Key recommendations from the workshop are as follows: 1) To ensure ethical interactions, there is a need to distinguish strong empathy from weak empathy in AI-based partners. 2) There is a need to investigate, be aware, and potentially be self-critical of one's own ethical position and assumptions on technology. This is not to suggest that one nation is wrong or right, but that it is valuable to understand one's own orienting beliefs before ethically assessing technology. 3) There is a need to recognize that empathy and emotion are seen in broader “ecological” terms, meaning that they are present in agents other than people. One does not have to agree, but governance should be aware that design and reception of design involve feeling-into things (and even feeling-into things by things). 4) If IEEE P7014.1 is correct and there will be more rather than less empathy-based interaction, there is a need to consider empathy fatigue.
- Status
- Published White Paper
- History
-
- Published:
- 2024-08-28
Working Group Details
Other Activities From This Working Group
Current projects that have been authorized by the IEEE SA Standards Board to develop a standard.
No Active Projects
Standards approved by the IEEE SA Standards Board that are within the 10-year lifecycle.
No Active Standards
These standards have been replaced with a revised version of the standard, or by a compilation of the original active standard and all its existing amendments, corrigenda, and errata.
No Superseded Standards
These standards have been removed from active status through a ballot where the standard is made inactive as a consensus decision of a balloting group.
No Inactive-Withdrawn Standards
These standards are removed from active status through an administrative process for standards that have not undergone a revision process within 10 years.
No Inactive-Reserved Standards