This recommended practice details the rules by which the provenance of Indigenous Peoples' data should be described and recorded. This recommended practice outlines the core parameters for providing and digitally embedding provenance information for Indigenous Peoples' data. The recommended practice establishes common descriptors and controlled vocabulary for provenance, including recommendations for metadata fields that can be used across industry sectors, including machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) contexts, biodiversity and genomic science innovation and other associated databases. This recommended practice supports proper and appropriate disclosure of originating data information. The recommended practice supports the long-term identification of Indigenous Peoples' data for future use, connecting data to people and place, and when appropriate, supporting future benefit sharing options.
- Sponsor Committee
- SSIT/SC - Social Implications of Technology Standards Committee
Learn More About SSIT/SC - Social Implications of Technology Standards Committee - Status
- Active PAR
- PAR Approval
- 2020-06-03
Working Group Details
- Society
- IEEE Society on Social Implications of Technology
Learn More About IEEE Society on Social Implications of Technology - Sponsor Committee
- SSIT/SC - Social Implications of Technology Standards Committee
Learn More About SSIT/SC - Social Implications of Technology Standards Committee - Working Group
-
IDWG - Indigenous Data Working Group
Learn More About IDWG - Indigenous Data Working Group - IEEE Program Manager
- Christy Bahn
Contact Christy Bahn - Working Group Chair
- Stephanie Carroll
Other Activities From This Working Group
Current projects that have been authorized by the IEEE SA Standards Board to develop a standard.
No Active Projects
Standards approved by the IEEE SA Standards Board that are within the 10-year lifecycle.
No Active Standards
These standards have been replaced with a revised version of the standard, or by a compilation of the original active standard and all its existing amendments, corrigenda, and errata.
No Superseded Standards
These standards have been removed from active status through a ballot where the standard is made inactive as a consensus decision of a balloting group.
No Inactive-Withdrawn Standards
These standards are removed from active status through an administrative process for standards that have not undergone a revision process within 10 years.
No Inactive-Reserved Standards