This recommended practice describes the methodology and application of 'compliance by design' in the area of human-robot interaction (HRI) with regard to socially assistive robots. Six topics are included: (1) metrics on behaviors for stakeholders in HRI; (2) metrics of different design practices (e.g., value-sensitive design, universal design, etc.) and their impacts to HRI governance; (3) risk assessment of using compliance by design for socially assistive robots; (4) use cases in compliance by design for socially assistive robots; (5) recommended methods for compliance by design for socially assistive robots (e.g., legal rules and knowledge modeling); (6) a conceptual framework of compliance by design for HRI governance, to enable robot developers to efficiently apply ethical behaviors into the design process for socially assistive robots and to help stakeholders reduce legal conflicts between existing laws and emerging technologies regarding the use of socially assistive robots in human spaces.
- Standard Committee
- SSIT/SC - Social Implications of Technology Standards Committee
- Joint Sponsors
-
C/AISC
RAS/SC
- Status
- Active PAR
- PAR Approval
- 2022-12-03
Working Group Details
- Society
- IEEE Society on Social Implications of Technology
- Standard Committee
- SSIT/SC - Social Implications of Technology Standards Committee
- Working Group
-
HRIWG - Design-Centered HRI and Governance
- IEEE Program Manager
- Christy Bahn
Contact Christy Bahn - Working Group Chair
- Yueh-Hsuan Weng
Other Activities From This Working Group
Current projects that have been authorized by the IEEE SA Standards Board to develop a standard.
No Active Projects
Standards approved by the IEEE SA Standards Board that are within the 10-year lifecycle.
No Active Standards
These standards have been replaced with a revised version of the standard, or by a compilation of the original active standard and all its existing amendments, corrigenda, and errata.
No Superseded Standards
These standards have been removed from active status through a ballot where the standard is made inactive as a consensus decision of a balloting group.
No Inactive-Withdrawn Standards
These standards are removed from active status through an administrative process for standards that have not undergone a revision process within 10 years.
No Inactive-Reserved Standards