IEEE Standards Interpretation for IEEE Std 1003.2™-1992 IEEE Standard for Information Technology--Portable Operating System Interfaces (POSIX®)--Part 2: Shell and Utilities
Copyright © 1996 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 3 Park Avenue New York, New York 10016-5997 USA All Rights Reserved.
Interpretations are issued to explain and clarify the intent of a standard and do not constitute an alteration to the original standard. In addition, interpretations are not intended to supply consulting information. Permission is hereby granted to download and print one copy of this document. Individuals seeking permission to reproduce and/or distribute this document in its entirety or portions of this document must contact the IEEE Standards Department for the appropriate license. Use of the information contained in this document is at your own risk.
IEEE Standards Department Copyrights and Permissions 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855-1331, USA
Interpretation Request #100
Topic: make Relevant Clauses: 22.214.171.124
The description on POSIX.2 P671, L361-363: When an escaped ‹newline› (one preceded by a backslash) is found anywhere in the makefile, it shall be replaced, along with any leading white space on the following line, with a single ‹space›. should not apply to command lines in makefiles.
It seems that historic practice is something more like: When an escaped ‹newline› (one preceded by a backslash) is found anywhere in the makefile except in a command line, it shall be replaced, along with any leading white space on the following line, with a single ‹space›.
When an escaped ‹newline› is found in a command line in a makefile, the command line passed to the command interpreter (see below) shall contain the backslash, the ‹newline›, and the next line, except the first character of the next line will not be given to the command interpreter if it is a ‹tab›. Note that the behavior of \‹newline› on command lines depends on quoting. Quoting is handled by the shell, not by make. Was this change intentional?
Interpretation Response #100
The standard states the behavior for escaped ‹newline›, and conforming implementations must conform to this. However, concerns have been raised about this which are being referred to the sponsor.
Rationale for Interpretation