Interpretations

Answering questions that may arise related to the meaning of portions of an IEEE standard concerning specific applications.

IEEE Standards Interpretations for IEEE Std 1003.1b™-1993 IEEE Standard for Information Technology - Portable Operating System Interfaces (POSIX(R)) - Part 1: System Application Program Interface (API) - Amendment 1: Realtime Extension [C language]

Copyright © 1996 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 3 Park Avenue New York, New York 10016-5997 USA All Rights Reserved.

Interpretations are issued to explain and clarify the intent of a standard and do not constitute an alteration to the original standard. In addition, interpretations are not intended to supply consulting information. Permission is hereby granted to download and print one copy of this document. Individuals seeking permission to reproduce and/or distribute this document in its entirety or portions of this document must contact the IEEE Standards Department for the appropriate license. Use of the information contained in this document is at your own risk.

IEEE Standards Department Copyrights and Permissions 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855-1331, USA

Interpretation Request #11
Topic: _POSIX_PRIORITIZED_IO part 3 Relevant Sections: 6.7.1.1, Page 153, Lines 733-734 Classification: (to be assigned)

The statement says "If {_POSIX_PRIORITIZED_IO} is defined, the implementation shall define for which files I/O prioritization is supported". The statement, as written, creates an untestable situation. Is an implementation which defines _POSIX_PRIORITIZED_IO, but defines no files for which I/O prioritization is supported (i.e. says it is supported for no files), a conforming implementation? It appears that if this were allowed, there would be no way to test conformance to the optional capabilities. Assuming that the interpretation answers "no" to the above question, I suggest that the sentence be clarified by also stating that "at least one implementation-defined file shall support I/O prioritization if this option is defined".

Interpretation Response
The standard is clear that it is implementation defined as to which, if any, files support the prioritized I/O option. This is testable by reading the conformance documentation which shall be provided by a conforming implementation. It is expected that any strictly conforming application will be cognizant of the implementation limitations and use that knowledge in the selection of systems to use.

Rationale for Interpretation
None.