The recommended practice leverages Machine Learning (ML) in synthetic aperture applications, including radar, sonar, radiometry, magnetic resonance imaging, automotive radar, remote sensing, ultrasound, and other imaging modes. The recommended practice addresses the choice of Machine Learning architectures for different imaging scenarios and the appropriate training regime. The recommended practice provides techniques for object classification and segmentation in synthetic aperture images. The document explores the best data format for ML algorithms in different synthetic aperture applications. Examples of machine learning architectures described by the recommended practice include traditional approaches such as deep learning, autoencoders, reinforcement learning, transformer models, convolutional neural networks (CNNs), recurrent neural networks (RNNs), and new generative approaches. Further different data regimes are considered, including subsampled and sparse approaches, as well as fully sampled data acquisitions.
- Standard Committee
- SPS/SASC - Synthetic Aperture Standards Committee
- Status
- Active PAR
- PAR Approval
- 2024-09-26
Working Group Details
- Society
- IEEE Signal Processing Society
- Standard Committee
- SPS/SASC - Synthetic Aperture Standards Committee
- Working Group
-
Machine Learning for Synthetic Apertures - Recommended Practice for Leveraging Machine Learning in Synthetic Apertures
- IEEE Program Manager
- Dalisa Gonzalez
Contact Dalisa Gonzalez - Working Group Chair
- Corina Nafornita
Other Activities From This Working Group
Current projects that have been authorized by the IEEE SA Standards Board to develop a standard.
No Active Projects
Standards approved by the IEEE SA Standards Board that are within the 10-year lifecycle.
No Active Standards
These standards have been replaced with a revised version of the standard, or by a compilation of the original active standard and all its existing amendments, corrigenda, and errata.
No Superseded Standards
These standards have been removed from active status through a ballot where the standard is made inactive as a consensus decision of a balloting group.
No Inactive-Withdrawn Standards
These standards are removed from active status through an administrative process for standards that have not undergone a revision process within 10 years.
No Inactive-Reserved Standards