This standard specifies the requirements for a mid-level ontology and for the creation of conforming extensions and modules (i.e., subsets) therefrom. A mid-level ontology is a set of well-defined terms and relations used across multiple domains, which enables conforming extensions for specific domains or applications. A mid-level ontology extends from (and conforms to) a top-level ontology.
- Standard Committee
- C/SABSC - Standards Activities Board Standards Committee
- Status
- Active PAR
- PAR Approval
- 2022-09-21
Working Group Details
- Society
- IEEE Computer Society
- Standard Committee
- C/SABSC - Standards Activities Board Standards Committee
- Working Group
-
OSWG - Ontology Standards Working Group
- IEEE Program Manager
- Jonathan Goldberg
Contact Jonathan Goldberg - Working Group Chair
- James Schoening
Other Activities From This Working Group
Current projects that have been authorized by the IEEE SA Standards Board to develop a standard.
P3195.1
Standard for Common Core Ontology (CCO)
This standard defines a mid-level ontology that specifies a set of well-defined terms and relations commonly used across multiple domains. It enables conforming extension ontologies to re-use these terms and introduce only the more specific terms and relations of their respective domains.
P3195.1.1
Standard for Cyber Ontology
This standard defines a conforming domain extension of P3195.1 Standard for Common Core Ontology. It specifies well-defined terms and relations for the domain of Cyber, which are too specific to be included in the Common Core Ontology.
P3195.1.2
Standard for Person Ontology
This standard specifies terms and definitions, and relationships amongst them, for the domain of the natural person. This ontology is expressed in a formal language that computers can process and is a conforming extension of P3195.1 (Standard for Common Core Ontology).
Standards approved by the IEEE SA Standards Board that are within the 10-year lifecycle.
No Active Standards
These standards have been replaced with a revised version of the standard, or by a compilation of the original active standard and all its existing amendments, corrigenda, and errata.
No Superseded Standards
These standards have been removed from active status through a ballot where the standard is made inactive as a consensus decision of a balloting group.
No Inactive-Withdrawn Standards
These standards are removed from active status through an administrative process for standards that have not undergone a revision process within 10 years.
No Inactive-Reserved Standards