A set of guidelines is presented in this recommended practice for the development of energy-efficient and power-proportional digital architectures so that energy is only consumed when computations are under way and energy is reduced in the non-operating state. The purpose of this practice is to provide guidelines for the designers and developers of digital architectures for creating power-proportionality at different levels of the system.
- Sponsor Committee
- COM/GreenICT-SC - Green ICT Standards Committee
- Status
- Active Standard
- PAR Approval
- 2016-12-07
- Board Approval
- 2022-04-26
- History
-
- Published:
- 2022-11-30
Working Group Details
- Society
- IEEE Communications Society
Learn More About IEEE Communications Society - Sponsor Committee
- COM/GreenICT-SC - Green ICT Standards Committee
- Working Group
-
EECH - Energy Efficient Comm Hardware
- IEEE Program Manager
- Dalisa Gonzalez
Contact Dalisa Gonzalez - Working Group Chair
- Sara Biyabani
Other Activities From This Working Group
Current projects that have been authorized by the IEEE SA Standards Board to develop a standard.
No Active Projects
Standards approved by the IEEE SA Standards Board that are within the 10-year lifecycle.
1923.1-2021
IEEE Standard for Computation of Energy Efficiency Upper Bound for Apparatus Processing Communication Signal Waveforms
A method for computation of an energy efficiency upper bound for an apparatus (wireless or wired) processing a particular communication signal waveform is specified in this standard. This method utilizes the signal envelope probability density function in combination with apparatus' power dissipation characteristics to calculate the energy efficiency upper bound. The purpose of this standard is to provide a consistent tool to other Working Groups and other practitioners who need to evaluate any communication signal waveforms potential for energy efficiency when implemented in hardware.
These standards have been replaced with a revised version of the standard, or by a compilation of the original active standard and all its existing amendments, corrigenda, and errata.
No Superseded Standards
These standards have been removed from active status through a ballot where the standard is made inactive as a consensus decision of a balloting group.
No Inactive-Withdrawn Standards
These standards are removed from active status through an administrative process for standards that have not undergone a revision process within 10 years.
No Inactive-Reserved Standards