Answering questions that may arise related to the meaning of portions of an IEEE standard concerning specific applications.

IEEE Standards Interpretations for IEEE Std 1003.2™-1992 IEEE Standard for Information Technology--Portable Operating System Interfaces (POSIX®)--Part 2: Shell and Utilities

Copyright © 1996 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 3 Park Avenue New York, New York 10016-5997 USA All Rights Reserved.

Interpretations are issued to explain and clarify the intent of a standard and do not constitute an alteration to the original standard. In addition, interpretations are not intended to supply consulting information. Permission is hereby granted to download and print one copy of this document. Individuals seeking permission to reproduce and/or distribute this document in its entirety or portions of this document must contact the IEEE Standards Department for the appropriate license. Use of the information contained in this document is at your own risk.

IEEE Standards Department, Copyrights and Permissions, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855-1331, USA

Interpretation Request #127
Topic: make Relevant Clauses:

Lines 322--323 state that "If make is invoked without any work needing to be done, it shall write a message to standard output indicating that no action was taken." My question is, what exactly is "no work needing to be done"? Historically, make would report that no worked needed to be done if there was no rule associated with either the dependency or with the inference rules, but would not report the lack of work if there was an empty rule (ie. a rule consisting only of whitespace). For example, the makefile .POSIX: foo: foo.u when executed with the command $ touch foo.u $ make foo would report that foo was up to date, since there is nothing to do, but the makefile .POSIX: foo: foo.u ; would complete silently, because there is something to do, namely "nothing".

Interpretation Response
The standard is unclear on this issue, and no conformance distinction can be made between alternative implementations based on this. This is being referred to the sponsor.

Rationale for Interpretation