IEEE Standards Interpretations for IEEE Std 802.11g™-1999 Information technology — Telecommunications and information exchange between systems — Local and metropolitan area networks — Specific requirements — Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications AMENDMENT 4: Further Higher Data Rate Extension in the 2.4 GHz Band
Copyright ©2005 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. Three Park Avenue New York, New York 10016-5997 USA All Rights Reserved.
Interpretations are issued to explain and clarify the intent of a standard and do not constitute an alteration to the original standard. In addition, interpretations are not intended to supply consulting information. Permission is hereby granted to download and print one copy of this document. Individuals seeking permission to reproduce and/or distribute this document in its entirety or portions of this document must contact the IEEE Standards Department for the appropriate license. Use of the information contained in this document is at your own risk.
IEEE Standards Department Copyrights and Permissions 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855-1331, USA
February 2005Interpretation Request #1 (1-01/05)
Topic: (Service field content) Relevant Clause: Annex GClassification: Conflicts with Clause 17
Clause 184.108.40.206 states that within the SERVICE field "Bit b2 is used to indicate that the transmit frequency and symbol clocks are derived from the same oscillator. For all ERP systems, the Locked Clock Bit shall be set to 1."
However, clause 220.127.116.11 states "The 8-bit IEEE 802.11SERVICE field shall be reserved for future use. The value of X'00' signifies IEEE 802.11 device compliance."
Is a Clause 19 ERP device non-conformant if it sends a 1 or 2 Mbps frame without the SERVICE field bit B2 set?Interpretation Response #1
The standard is unambiguous in this case. A PHY implementing Clause 19 shall set bit B2 in the Service field, as required by 18.104.22.168 in all transmissions. A PHY implementing Clause 15 that is dependent upon a particular value in a reserved field for its correct operation is not compliant with the standard. All implementations must ignore values of reserved fields upon reception. The editor of the standard will be instructed to remove the sentence "The value of X'00' signifies IEEE 802.11 device compliance " from 22.214.171.124.