IEEE Standards Interpretations for IEEE Std 1003.1c™-1995 IEEE Standard for Information Technology--Portable Operating System Interface (POSIX(R)) - System Application Program Interface (API) Amendment 2: Threads Extension (C Language)
Copyright © 1996 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. 3 Park Avenue New York, New York 10016-5997 USA All Rights Reserved.
Interpretations are issued to explain and clarify the intent of a standard and do not constitute an alteration to the original standard. In addition, interpretations are not intended to supply consulting information. Permission is hereby granted to download and print one copy of this document. Individuals seeking permission to reproduce and/or distribute this document in its entirety or portions of this document must contact the IEEE Standards Department for the appropriate license. Use of the information contained in this document is at your own risk.
IEEE Standards Department, Copyrights and Permissions, 445 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, New Jersey 08855-1331, USA
Interpretation Request #38
Topic: mutex Relevant Clauses: 126.96.36.199
Why does a mutex only allow multiple threads to serialize their access to “shared data”? A mutex may be used to provide mutual exclusion among threads trying to access any sort of shared resource. For example, several threads may occasionally need to utilize a single hardware co-processor, and may serialize access to that resource with a mutex even though it isn't “shared data”. Suggested Correction: Change the phrase “shared data” to “shared resources”.
The part of the definition cited is informative in scope and does not require any restrictions on conforming applications. The proposed change may add some additional clarity and will be referred to the sponsor for consideration.
Rationale for Interpretation
The wording of the particular sentence is neither binding upon the application, nor is it constrained by the interface, and it is not testable by a conformance test. Changing 'data' to 'resources' may help someone inexperienced in this area but does not seem to make a significant improvement in the standard.